« Doctor Zhivago | Main | Costco Trip »

01 July 2003 — The Year of Reading Proust (15)

I've found an odd combination which allows me to sleep soundly: I sleep on the living room floor, on the vibromat (a massage pad), wearing the sleep mask, with the sliding door open (and screen shut, which allows cool air in but does not allow the cats out), after drinking a glass of wine or taking a painkiller (depending on my needs). Strange, yes, but it's working. I'm mostly well-rested. (I say mostly well-rested because, actually, this morning I'm a bit tired.)

I'm becoming Proust. (See, that's funny because Proust slept in a cork-lined room, kept odd hours, was basically all screwed up evey which way. I'm saying that I...oh, never mind.)


In my mind, I'm dwelling in a writing mode. In reality, I have little urge to write. Perhaps it's that I want to read about writing.

I recently finished Phyllis Rose's The Year of Reading Proust, a book with a misleading title. The book's subtitle, A Memoir in Real Time, is a more accurate description of its contents, though one is forced to ask: "What does Rose mean by 'real time'?" Likely she uses the phrase merely for effect. (But which effect?)

The Year of Reading Proust comprises a series of essays of a generally autobiographical nature. Rose recounts her life in New York and in Florida, copes with her dying mother, meditates on a writing lifestyle, contemplates love and friendship. It is not disinteresting, though at times it is not wholly engaging, either. Because I chose this book as supplemental Proust reading, I longed for more mention of him. Proust is featured prominently in the first and the last essays, and Rose uses quotes from Remembrance of Things Past as chapter epigraphs, but in the remainder of the book, she's content to simply toss in a Proust mention here and there in every essay. (And these often seem like afterthoughts: "Oh — I've decided that Proust is this collection's unifying theme; I'd better go add a reference to him in each essay.")

I probably sound more disappointed than I was. The book was okay. Parts were even insightful, thought-provoking, and ultimately it inspired several Proust-related discussion questions for the upcoming book group meeting.


The FC Saints cannot buy a break.

From my perspective, the team is much better than last year, yet our results are similar. Through eight games, we've lost five and tied three. In ten games last seasons, we lost nine and won one.

Admittedly, we've been in nearly every game this season, haven't suffered the blowouts to which we were subjected in the fall. Last season we were outscored 43-12 in ten games. This season, we've only been outscored 25-12 in eight games. That's still not good, but it's a vast improvement.

Mart observed last night — and I think he's correct — that each individual player seems skilled enough, matches up well against the opposing players, but our team doesn't operate as a team, work as a group. We're more like a bunch of individuals with a common goal rather than a single team united. Many of the other teams we play (like the team last night), have a degree of organization that gives them an edge our team lacks.

Some of this teamwork will come with time. Their were hints of it last night. Near the end of the first half, the Saints were pressing the attack. Katie had pushed the ball up the right wing and was looking to cross it to the middle, which — and this is another weakness we have — was too congested. She spied Jefferson. Jefferson then did something outstanding: he anticipated Katie's pass and he deferred, he pointed behind him to Debbie, who had set up near midfield, by herself. Katie passed to Debbie, and our offense was better able to spread the field and mount a more aggressive attack. If Katie had passed to Jefferson, the ball would likely have been intercepted or quickly wrested from his possession.

It's this kind of stuff we need to learn. Our team rarely passes back, yet it's one of the most vital skills in soccer. One cannot push the ball forward all the time. It's not possible to do so and remain effective. The best teams know that passing back is often the best way to move forward. We haven't learned that yet. Time and again we forego the drop in favor of a weak push forward.

We've got a great group of players, and our play has improved, but if we want to begin to win, we need to begin working as a team, to practice sound soccer fundamentals. Perhaps those are things we can practice as we head into the fall season. If we did some soccer drills, as boring as they sound, instead of just scrimmaging at practices, it might pay dividends on the field.

I still think we're going to win a game or two before the end of this season, though. I like our chances against Little Booters in two weeks.

Updated FC Saints spring web page coming soon. (Better late than never!)

On this day at foldedspace.org

2005Scary Movie   I'm not one who is easily spooked. Sometimes it happens, though. The Exorcist is a scary movie.

2004Robot Parade   The kids and I grabbed great handfuls of paper and ran across the lawn singing They Might Be Giants' Robot Parade.

Comments
On 01 July 2003 (10:19 AM), Joelah said:

It was a good game, definitely seemed closer to me than the 2-0 score would indicate. Our opponents were very well organized, very good passers, unhurried in their attack. None of them were superstars, but it seemed like every player did two little things: Played positionally well, passed well.
These guys are a brand new team, so it's not like they've had years to develop this mentality. We could do what they do. There's some mysterious problem here, I've often sneered at sports psychology, but that field may have some insight into our struggle.
Or, perhaps, as JD says, we just need to catch a few breaks.


On 01 July 2003 (11:31 AM), Tiffany said:

Do you ever get a chance to practice as a team? That seems to be the only way to set up those ‘team skills’.


On 01 July 2003 (12:19 PM), Rich said:

Here's what we need. From August through October, and then from February through April, we need to have practices each week.

Here's the rub. Will people commit to something like that? Even if we do 1 hour of drills, and 1 hour of scrimmage/pick-up ball, my guess is people won't do it. In the lead up to our league season, we had weekly practices for a month, and we had like a 25% participation rate.


On 01 July 2003 (01:14 PM), Mac said:

from august through october is not problem for me...it's the Feb through April that I can't make. Let's make it happen Rich!


On 01 July 2003 (01:15 PM), mart said:

hey all.

last night's game was pretty disappointing. for me personally, i just couldn't get anything to come off my foot correctly. it was like i had 2 left feet. but more importantly i felt very little connection with my fellow defenders...

communication is oh so so so critical back there. we defenders should be chatting like a bunch of hens. i've got him, she's coming across. she's yrs now. i'm releasing him and moving up. constant chatter. AND (this is a big one...) there needs to be a BOSS in the defense. to me, unlike the other positions on the field, defense is an area where free-roving, creative tactics just don't play. it's all about following a few simple rules, listening to your section leader and stopping them. i feel a bit weird bing the new guy and running out and trying to run that show back there, but someone has to do it... someone who knows wtf to do and someone who the other defenders know is in charge and will defer to. there can be no disagreements back there. the man says step up or mark him or whatever and you simply have to do that. no questioning, no thinking. just do it.

fc trap n balls was a pretty good team, bettre by far than the past 2 we've played. they were fast, physical and coordinated in attack. some of those guys would fit right into the teams we play in our mens league so i don't think there's a lot of shame in the loss...

still a loss is a loss and it means we've still got some way to go. saints seem to be a better team each week. there are some encouraging developments out there. practices would help greatly. and indeed not just scrimmaging but drilling. i'll commit to practice as needed so long as it doesn't interfere with american bacon games or practices (that's my first priority, sorry).

i'm feeling like lately saints have been in these games, but we're getting undone at some crucial times or for specific reasons as opposed to last season's saints which when we played against you, you guys just seemed hapless and hopeless. it's coming along.

also: this is a personal observation... but i think that relentless subbing rotation can be a drag. one reason last week's game was a good one was that we only had 2 subs and there was consistency. this week you're pulling a player who's performing well in their position and putting in someone who might not be good or might be a bad match against their opponent, etc. unfortunately it's a tough problem to crack. if you want everyone to get equal time and you have a large roster, it's impossible to solve. on my team, i've got some guys who understand they're not starters and will get reduced playing time. they grumble sometimes, but less than you'd expect especially when it means they're subbing into a winning side (and then they know they've got 5 minutes to go out and make an impression on me, their teammates and the game).

so that's my 4 cents. still enjoying playing with y'all. thanks.


On 01 July 2003 (01:26 PM), mart said:

one more thing.

joel: you kicked ass last night man. really starting to take command of that area back there. now if only we can get you over that first 5-minute hump that seems to get you... top-notch work otherwise though!


On 01 July 2003 (02:36 PM), Joelah said:

Yeah, I actually just emailed JD complaining about how stiff and hesitant I am until... something happens to loosen me up. I think my growing awareness of this issue can help. Or maybe I should bite the head off a rabbit before each game or something.

Regarding quarterbacking the D, I know that's traditionally the keeper's job as he can see the whole field and generally has time to stand around and observe. I'm working on improving in this part of the job, just as I'm sure my teammates are working at getting used to decoding my desperate "Get that guy! ...that guy with the black shirt! The big one!"

As far as subs go, I think I'd rather stick with equal time for everyone even if it means having to work harder to win... or tie anyway.


On 01 July 2003 (02:50 PM), J.D. said:

I actually agree with Mart on the subbing issue. My personal preference is for a more competitive focus, at the expense of a few bruised egos. I understand, though, that I'm in the minority, so I'm perfectly willing to rotate subs on a near-equal-playing-time basis. It does disrupt game flow, though, and it is impossible to make things perfectly equal. It was a bummer last night to pull Katie and Rich as they'd managed to work the ball up the sideline and were beginning to play well together, but that's what happens sometimes in a time-based subbing plan. Maybe some kind of compromise is in order: don't pull Katie and Rich in a situation like that, but let them play out the attack til the end, sacrificing the balanced playtime.

I also agree that communication is key. We've got good chatter from the sideline, and Joel QBs the defense, but individual team members need to talk to each other. That whole Jefferson thing I mentioned before was spectacular simply because it's exactly what needs to happen.

At one point last night we had Pam and Sarah and Jefferson and one other person all clustered around the ball, but nobody said anything and nobody knew what to do. What the hell?!? Talk! Make plans! It helps.

I like Mart's example of the defense talking with each other. With a talkative keeper to support them, and talk amongst themselves, there's no reason a defense can't work together as a cohesive unit, even without practice.

FC Saints rock! :)


On 01 July 2003 (03:47 PM), mart said:

having a vocal and observant (even directing) keeper is a beautiful thing. but i must stress that it's no substitute for a captain in defense.

basically when 4 defenders are played at the back (as we and almost everyone else does) you really need to think of them as having a rope tied around each person's waist linking them to one another. the effect this has is that when the right back makes a run forward, it tugs the 2 centrebacks and the left back over to a more central role to cover. if a centreback moves up, it tugs the other CB more central still and the left and right backs move in as well. it's a bit simplistic, but the point is that you almost draw a line around those 4 and say everything you do is a coordinated effort.

it would also be enlightening to show how when one defender makes a bad decision, it affects the choices the other ones have to make.

a possible thought on subbing? don't do what i'm always tempted to do and keep adding players to the roster without letting others go. hehe. for some reason that just makes things worse. can't figure out why though.


On 01 July 2003 (03:48 PM), mart said:

oh and jd? get a separate forum or something set up for footie chatter lest we keep riddling your proust posts with this prattle.


On 01 July 2003 (04:02 PM), Tammy said:

Mart couldn't you post your "footie prattle" on Jd's community forum? Just a thought.


On 01 July 2003 (04:19 PM), Joelah said:

Now, Tammy, since over half of today's blog involves footie, all of our comments have been entirely on-topic. If, however, you'd really like to talk about Proust, if Wild Stallions couldn't hold you back as far as Prousting goes, well, I understand.


On 01 July 2003 (05:48 PM), Dave said:

Did anyone notice that the sleep mask:
"Comes beautifully packaged and presented."

Wow. I never knew that this was a selling point for things that block out light...


On 01 July 2003 (09:59 PM), Tammy said:

No Joelah, I have no problem with all this footie talk. I was only responding to Marts post dierectly above mine. I just thought rather than set up an entire seperate forum for this, as he requested, you all could just use the forum Jd has already set up.

Psst! Wanna know something funny. I have no idea how to play soccer so it's really just all proust to me! ( I slay me)


On 01 July 2003 (11:11 PM), dowingba said:

You kick the spherical object (known as the "ball") into that meshy roped object (known as the "net" or "goal"). I know, it sounds just way too easy, but there's a catch! This bipedal creature tries to stop the "ball" from entering the "net" (known as the "goalkeeper").


Post a comment
Name


Email Address
(required, not shown)


URL


Comments




Remember info?