« House Update: Painting (part two) | Main | Unexpected Encounters »

29 July 2004 — Out of Many, One (10)

Here is a partial transcript of Barack Obama's speech before the Democratic National Convention (video here). Some people are saying this man may be our future President. He's certainly more charismatic — and a better speaker — than any President we've had since Reagan.

Now, let me be clear. Let me be clear. We have real enemies in the world. These enemies must be found. They must be pursued. And they must be defeated.

John Kerry knows this. And just as Lieutenant Kerry did not hesitate to risk his life to protect the men who served with him in Vietnam, President Kerry will not hesitate one moment to use our military might to keep America safe and secure.

John Kerry believes in America. And he knows that it's not enough for just some of us to prosper. For alongside our famous individualism, there's another ingredient in the American saga, a belief that we are all connected as one people.

If there's a child on the south side of Chicago who can't read, that matters to me, even if it's not my child.

If there's a senior citizen somewhere who can't pay for their prescription and having to choose between medicine and the rent, that makes my life poorer, even if it's not my grandparent.

If there's an Arab-American family being rounded up without benefit of an attorney or due process, that threatens my civil liberties.

It is that fundamental belief -- it is that fundamental belief -- I am my brother's keeper, I am my sisters' keeper -- that makes this country work.

It's what allows us to pursue our individual dreams, yet still come together as a single American family: "E pluribus unum," out of many, one.

Now even as we speak, there are those who are preparing to divide us, the spin masters and negative ad peddlers who embrace the politics of anything goes.

Well, I say to them tonight, there's not a liberal America and a conservative America; there's the United States of America.

There's not a black America and white America and Latino America and Asian America; there's the United States of America.

The pundits, the pundits like to slice and dice our country into red states and blue States: red states for Republicans, blue States for Democrats. But I've got news for them, too. We worship an awesome God in the blue states, and we don't like federal agents poking around our libraries in the red states.

We coach little league in the blue states and, yes, we've got some gay friends in the red states.

There are patriots who opposed the war in Iraq, and there are patriots who supported the war in Iraq.

We are one people, all of us pledging allegiance to the stars and stripes, all of us defending the United States of America.

In the end, that's what this election is about. Do we participate in a politics of cynicism, or do we participate in a politics of hope?

John Kerry calls on us to hope. John Edwards calls on us to hope. I'm not talking about blind optimism here, the almost willful ignorance that thinks unemployment will go away if we just don't think about it, or health care crisis will solve itself if we just ignore it.

That's not what I'm talking. I'm talking about something more substantial. It's the hope of slaves sitting around a fire singing freedom songs; the hope of immigrants setting out for distant shores; the hope of a young naval lieutenant bravely patrolling the Mekong Delta; the hope of a millworker's son who dares to defy the odds; the hope of a skinny kid with a funny name who believes that America has a place for him, too.

Hope in the face of difficulty, hope in the face of uncertainty, the audacity of hope: In the end, that is God's greatest gift to us, the bedrock of this nation, a belief in things not seen, a belief that there are better days ahead.

I believe that we can give our middle class relief and provide working families with a road to opportunity.

I believe we can provide jobs for the jobless, homes to the homeless, and reclaim young people in cities across America from violence and despair.

I believe that we have a righteous wind at our backs, and that as we stand on the crossroads of history, we can make the right choices and meet the challenges that face us.

America, tonight, if you feel the same energy that I do, if you feel the same urgency that I do, if you feel the same passion that I do, if you feel the same hopefulness that I do, if we do what we must do, then I have no doubt that all across the country, from Florida to Oregon, from Washington to Maine, the people will rise up in November, and John Kerry will be sworn in as president. And John Edwards will be sworn in as vice president. And this country will reclaim it's promise. And out of this long political darkness a brighter day will come.

Thank you very much, everybody.

Also: the transcript of Bill O'Reilly and Michael Moore's mutual interview.

On this day at foldedspace.org

2005You Are What You Eat   It might seem absurd, but eating is a political act. Connect with your food. Eat deliberately.

2003Simon Has Two Mommies   In which Simon decides that two families are better than one. In which Kris consents that we may acquire another cat. In which my cousin Laurie cackles with glee as her $10 kittens sell better than the FREE kittens in her neighborhood.

Comments
On 29 July 2004 (08:52 AM), Denise said:

Ok - I am the last person that should be spouting off about politics...but could this guy run for President this year? He is the first politician in years to accurately describe what it means to be a US citizen.


On 29 July 2004 (09:01 AM), Jeremy said:

A-fuckin-men!!! I would actually feel good about voting if I could vote for this guy this year!!! It's just to bad that politics in the United States is such a mess of lies and corruption. We need a leader that knows how to work, what the average person feels like. Oh well, I guess one can dream.


On 29 July 2004 (09:20 AM), dowingba said:

RE: The Moore/O'Reilly link. I would be loth to believe anything that surfaces in the Drudge Report -- especially if it isn't documented anywhere else (and if it is, I haven't found it). I'll wait until this actually airs somewhere before I begin cheering about how utterly stupid Moore comes off in that interview...


On 29 July 2004 (09:55 AM), Jeff said:

JD said, "so I'll go make boxes instead..."

Woohoo! JD is going to help in the shop! I wonder if he remembers how to make boxes...

Oh wait, we're slow right now. The guys are sweeping the floors and standing around, so there are no boxes for JD (or me) to make. So keep stirring the pot, JD (and I will keep playing golf on the computer).


On 29 July 2004 (01:31 PM), Denise said:

Yes, J.D. - exactly.


On 29 July 2004 (05:04 PM), tammy said:

Listen Jd, I'm not saying Bush has been perfect. I'm not saying all his decisions have been right. But compared to Kerry he's a much better vote. I don't like Kerrys hobnobbing with the Communists for one thing. You know how worried I am about Communism. I don't need to vote in a president who's picture hangs in a Vietnamese museum. The Vietnamese communists clearly recognize John Kerry's contributions to their victory. I don't need that. I don't want that.

Along with his stand on abortion and many other issues that are too lengthy to go into, I just don't want to see him President.

As for Clinton; want my private opinion? I think he's the sexiest president in my day. If I wouldn't have the morals and values that I have I may just have seen if I couldn't have become an intern myself back then! He's hot! But that doesn't mean I have to like his presidency.

Over all I just feel better with Bush as my president. There! Hows that for half baked again?


On 29 July 2004 (05:22 PM), Joel said:

Well, Tammy, since you have been so open, and in the spirit of giving the other side it's due, I kind of think Rumsfeld's kind of cute.


On 29 July 2004 (06:57 PM), Tammy said:

(((((Joel!))))


On 29 July 2004 (10:30 PM), Dana said:
I'll agree that Moore is willfully difficult in the interview. I mean, O'Reilly is probably correct in arguing that Bush didn't lie, he was just misinformed. (Whether or not that's any better is another discussion.) I don't why Moore can't just yield this point; it's not a loss.

Er. Perhaps we read different transcripts? I thought O'Reilly came off as more of a jerk than Moore did.

Here's what I read Moore's point as:

1) GWB: "X is true, I have Y telling me so! Because X is true, we should invade and depose Z!"

2) We invade and depose Z

3) Y is in fact wrong and/or lying

4) GWB: "It doesn't matter that X isn't true, because Z was a horrible dictator that deserved to be deposed!"

Now, is GWB willfully lying? Maybe not. Do we deserve an apology for being taken to war under an untrue justification? I think so. Do we deserve an apology from the President for the quality of the decisions he makes, the quality of the people who work for him, and the quality of the people whom he trusts? I think so.

I think the point about sacrificing children to achieve our goals is Moore's strongest point.

900+ American Citizens are dead. Was deposing the Hussein regime worth 900+ dead? When it was the Hussein regime armed with WMDs, funding al Qaieda, and presented as an imminent threat the answer the Congress and the US Population gave was 'yes'. But Hussein all by himself without WMDs, not funding al Qaieda, and no imminent threat to the US, well, the answer for the previous, what, 25 or 30 years of his regime was a fairly clear 'no'.

Are 900+ lives worth it to remove the threat of al Qaieda? Probably. Does deposing the government of Afghanistan remove the threat of al Qaieda? No, but it does inconvenience them. Does deposing the government of Iraq remove the threat of al Qaieda? No.

The President, best case scenario, had these facts:

1) al Qaieda has bases in Afghanistan and agents all over the world
2) Iraq has WMD
3) There is NO CONNECTION between Iraq and al Qaieda

His decision? Topple both governments and occupy their nations with the US military. How has this removed the threat of al Qaieda? Diminished it? Was it even an efficient way in which to approach the threat al Qaieda posed?

We spent 900+ lives and 87+ billion dollars to depose Hussein and militarily occupy Iraq. Was it worth it? 87 billion dollars buys an awful lot of... Well, let's consult the CIA world factbook, shall we?

The annual budget of various nations:

Afghanistan: $500 million
Australia: $84.1 billion
Austria: $70 billion
Bangladesh: $6.8 billion
Belgium: $106 billion
Bolivia: $4 billion
Canada: $161.4 billion
Chile: $15.6 billion
Denmark: $51.3 billion
India: $78.2 billion

Iraq: $13.4 billion

Norway: $57.6 billion
Russia: $62 billion
Switzerland: $30 billion

US: $2.052 trillion

So, let's put this in perspective. The US, a nation of some 280 million souls, just spent more than the annual budget of the nation of India, population: 1,065,070,607 (that's 1 billion), in order to depose and occupy a nation with the population of Texas (Iraq: 25 million US census gives Texas: 22 million) and an annual budget about 1/6th what we spent (87 billion vs. 13 billion).

Right.

And we wonder why the rest of the world doesn't like us. Sheesh.


On 30 July 2004 (07:10 AM), Jeff said:

Amen Dana.


Post a comment
Name


Email Address
(required, not shown)


URL


Comments




Remember info?