« On Podcasting | Main | Three Cats and a Squirrel »

28 May 2005 — The Golden Rules of Weblogging (8)

Weblogging isn't difficult. It's something anyone can do. (You should try it.) There are, however, a few guidelines to keep in mind to make the experience more rewarding for both you and your readers.

Rule One: Write what you want — it's your space.
Everyone has something to say.

Don't try to emulate the so-called A-List bloggers. You're not an A-List blogger. You're you.

What are your hobbies? What are your passions? What childhood events shaped who you are today? What do you know that nobody else knows? Write about this stuff, the stuff you know. It'll make your weblog unique, more authentic, and interesting.

Don't fret that if you write about computer games you're going to alienate your audience. Don't fret that if you write about how much you love to play the violin you'll scare people away. Don't fret that people don't want to hear about your two-year-old daughter's fascination with the toilet. Your audience will find you.

Write what you know.

Rule Two: Post often.
"Why doesn't Jeff post more often?" Kris asked me tonight. "More people would read him if he wrote more."

"Lynn has a new entry up," I said by way of response.

"She should write more often, too," Kris said.

The frequency with which I visit an individual weblog is directly related to how often new entries get posted. For example, I check kottke several times a day. That's not because Jason's weblog is great — it's interesting in a detached, flavorless sort of way — but because he updates it every few hours with new links. (He's a great source for my flotch.) On the other hand, I only check onfocus once a day. I'm more interested in pb's weblog than in Jason's, but pb doesn't post nearly as often.

Also note that most weblogs take months or years to develop an audience. I've been posting several times a week for four years. This main page now receives about 250 unique visitors every day. For the first year, I was lucky to have four unique visitors every day: Mac, Dana, Kris, and myself.

If you want readers, post often. If you want more readers, keep at it.

Rule Three: Don't become a slave to your weblog.
Contrary to rule two: if you have nothing to say, it's probably best not to post. Posting for the sake of posting leads to the much-maligned (and deservedly so) "what I had for breakfast" type entries that everyone mocks.

All webloggers are guilty of breaking this rule from time-to-time. (I do it often enough to make me cringe!) It's easy to feel obligated to post something for your readers. Don't do it unless you have something that must be said.

If you need a week or two off from your weblog, take the time off. It'll only make it better in the long run.

Rule Four: Don't expect anyone to read your weblog.
There are tens of thousands of weblogs. (Hundreds of thousands? Millions?) Many people believe all weblogs are exactly alike: festering pits of narcissism. Perhaps they're right. Whatever the case, it's unlikely that your weblog will ever have any sort of audience outside close friends and family members. Don't pin your self-esteem on your site's visitor stats.

Rule Five: Always assume everyone reads your weblog.
On the other hand:

By their very nature weblogs are public documents, exposed for the world to see. If you write something, be willing to take responsibilty for your words. You never know who is reading your weblog.

I've discovered that some of the people I least expect read my weblog every day: long-lost friends, distant family members, customers, neighbors, people I've only met in passing. This happens so often that I'm no longer surprised when somebody I barely know says, "Oh yeah — I read that on your web site." I try to be sure that what I write is something I'd be willing share in person.

(Example: I once wrote about an experience from my youth. I told the story from my viewpoint, and the picture it painted of another person was not altogether complimentary. I learned later that this person, a person I've not seen in twenty years, is well-aware of this weblog entry. I made no alterations to the story when I learned this; I stand by it as my perception of what happened, and would have told the story exactly the same way had the person been in the room.)


If you follow these guidelines, you'll find that your weblog is better for it. I cannot emphasize enough how important it is that you write for yourself. Everyone has something to say. Weblogs are the perfect vehicle for saying it.

On this day at foldedspace.org

2004Disorganized   My super power may be organization, but moving is my kryptonite.

2003Cats and Dogs   Animals are a big part of my world.

2001A Passage to India   I am an ardent believer that perception clouds judgment, causes different people to see different things. I've mentioned this before in this journal, I think, and I will mention it until I die. What a person brings to a situation determines that person's perceptions.

Comments
On 28 May 2005 (12:00 AM), J.D. said:

A couple of other important points:

  • Learn to write well. Take a writing class. Read books on how to write. Develop your style. Even good writers get lazy and post poorly-written entries, but the better your grasp of the fundamentals, the better your weblog will be.
  • If you want other people to read your weblog, read their weblogs. Leave comments. Strike up an internet friendship with them. Don't be disingenuous. Find others with whom you share genuine interests, and develop a mutual appreciation society of sorts.
  • Have fun!
Creating my own weblog is one of the best things I've ever done.


On 28 May 2005 (06:34 AM), al said:

Wow. Thanks for the link back to the Character Camp entry, which was written before I started reading your blog. It's really telling in so many ways. It's also satisfying (to me anyway) that Byron knows about it.

I have lots of "Young Life" stories I intend to tell someday, hopefully in a book.


On 28 May 2005 (04:45 PM), Mom said:

Good points and very useful to this beginning blogger. I have been a bit disappointed because my friends don't seem to read my blog -- blogging seems to be more of an activity for younger people. They would rather get their news from me and my pictures via e-mail. I don't know how long I'll keep doing it.


On 28 May 2005 (05:51 PM), Tammy said:

Funny you should write about this today. I agree with every point except the idea that you will never really get much more of an audience than close freinds and family members. I only have about 8 friends and family members reading mine. When I closed dishpan dribble my unique visitors were around 250 I believe. When I started at a new url two weeks later I dropped to about 50 visitors. I had been at Dishpan a year and the quickest way to lose readers is to change your address!

I have now been blogging at my new address for 6 months and am again in the 200's. Just as I've built back my readership I am now closing for good, or at least for a couple of years anyway. I need to raise my kids and the blogging is interferring with all the things I want to do. I get too addicted to it. It's now time to return to real life. I was spending about 2 hours on the computer a day. Sometimes I would return to again at night after the kids were in bed but I don't really consider that as part of my "guilty" computer time.

I have thought about leaving my weblogging until after the kids are in bed every night but I cant seem to summon the will power so as a result I am shutting down.

Thanks Jd for getting me started in this wonderful world of writing and publishing via the web. I feel so empty without my blog but I spose I'll get used to it.


On 28 May 2005 (06:05 PM), Mom said:

I'm sorry to hear that, Tammy, although at the same time, I can understand your reasoning. I hope that once your kids are older, you will be able to find the time to blog again because you have a great deal of writing talent and I have enjoyed reading your blogs.

As far as my blogging goes, after e-mailing privately back and forth to J.D., I have my second wind again. It's a good thing, because I'm addicted. :-)


On 28 May 2005 (06:06 PM), Jeff said:

I realize that more people would read my entry if I posted more often, but posting more often is not as easy as it sounds. Sometimes I sit down to compose an entry and get nothing, other times I have inpiration for an entry but no time to compose it. I do go through phases where

I do a new entry every couple days, but I quickly run out of ideas -- if I continued at that pace, it would eventually it would turn into a "what I had for breakfast" weblog.


On 28 May 2005 (06:09 PM), Jeff said:

Grrr... that should say, "I realize that more people would read my weblog..."


On 28 May 2005 (11:23 PM), Fiona said:

And rule number six - when your fans email you to complement you on your wonderful blog... reply!


Post a comment
Name


Email Address
(required, not shown)


URL


Comments




Remember info?