« Book Survey | Main | A Brief Guide to Better Sleep »

07 September 2005 — The End of Comic Book Movies? (9)

Marvel Entertainment, publishers of some of my favorite comic books from childhood, has concluded a financing deal that grants the company a $525 million line of credit to make up to ten films based on its properties. From the MSN article I linked to earlier:

The move comes amid Marvel's struggle with weakening sales. In the latest second quarter, the company posted an eleven percent drop in profit, hurt by sharply lower licensing and toy sales amid waning demand for merchandise from last summer's Spider-Man 2 movie. Marvel said the ten characters in the arrangement are Captain America, The Avengers, Nick Fury, Black Panther, Ant-Man, Cloak & Dagger, Dr. Strange, Hawkeye, Power Pack, and Shang-Chi. Each film is expected to have a budget of up to $165 million dollars and a rating no more restrictive than PG-13. Although the financing allows for the production of animated films, Marvel currently intends to use the funds to make only live-action films.

I realize that most of you don't care: comic books are, to you, kids stuff. I've spent my entire life reading comics, though, so I do care, if only a little bit. (In general, I'm not fond of superhero films.)

The real problem with this deal is that Marvel vastly overestimates the public's interest in superheroes and in superhero movies. I know that Kris will have no interest in seeing any film based on these characters. I suspect that most of my readers would agree with her. Hell, I'm a lifelong comic book reader and even I only have interest in films based on two of these characters: Captain America and Dr. Strange.

Captain America, created in 1941, is just what you'd expect: a star-spangled supersoldier (inexplicably carrying a giant round shield) who mostly fights Nazis. His biggest enemy is — brace yourself — the Red Skull, a sort of super-Nazi. It's cheesy, yes, but if a film were set during World War Two, it might be fun in an Indiana Jones kind of way.

Dr. Strange isn't really a superhero. He's a mystic. He's a sorcerer who travels through space and time by means of the astral plane. In the stories I've read, he mostly does a lot of spying. He enters a meditative trance and his astral form leaves his physical body to spy on evil-doers across the city. Then Dr. Strange calls the cops. His arch-nemesis is the dread Dorammu. Again, it doesn't sound too exciting, but it might play well if the right creative people put it together.

The other characters available for films? They're enough to make a man weep. Some might be translated into mediocre films, but others suck in comic form, and they're just going to suck more in film form. Hawkeye? Hawkeye is lame! He's Aquaman-lame:

Hawkeye has trained himself to become an expert archer with near-perfect accuracy. He practices a minimum of two hours per day to keep his skills honed. He has also had extensive training as an aerialist and acrobat, and personal tutoring by Captain America in hand-to-hand combat. Hawkeye possesses vary keen eyesight and exceptional reflexes. Hawkeye is 80% deaf in both ears, due to an incident, and wears specially-designed miniature hearing aids. Hawkeye wields a number of custom-made bows, and carries a quiver containing various gadget-laden "trick" arrows.

(I like the "trick" in quotation marks.)

And, of course, you know how dumb I think Ant-Man is; I can't possibly imagine how they'll make a film based around him. What's he going to do? Fight off an invasion of locusts?

For years, Marvel has struggled to maintain its financial footing. I'm not an industry expert, and I don't actually buy that many comic books anymore, but from my perspective, the problems with the company are that (a) they've always had a pathological need for growth and (b) they refuse to remain focused on what they're about, which is comic books.

Now, if they'd make a film based on Powers, I'd be all over that.

(For the record, here's the slashdot post that inspired this rant, and here's my metafilter post about the subject.)

On this day at foldedspace.org

2004Yet Another House Update   Our list of home-improvement projects never gets shorter; new projects rise to replace the old ones we retire.

2003Hello, Autumn   In which I listen to the rhythm of the falling rain.

2001Aspiring Writer   I want to be a writer, and always have.

Comments
On 07 September 2005 (11:22 AM), Dave said:

Already posted in Flotch, but reposted here:
Actually, I could see the Dr. Strange movie working well if they did it much like Hellboy was done or Batman Begins, but as for the rest... Captain America is a good concept, but there's been at least 2 movies (not including the serial) before and they went nowhere. IMDB lists it as in production for 2007. The Avengers? Hard to see that working out. Why not try the Superfriends? At least they have a proven history... Nick Fury? David Hasselhoff. Need I say more? Black Panther, Ant-Man, Cloak & Dagger, Hawkeye, and Power Pack? Not a chance (ok, in theory I suppose that Black Panther *might* stand a chance if done really, really well). Shang-Chi might do alright IF it's handled as a GOOD kung-fu movie rather than a superhero movie or cheezy kung-fu movie. Perhaps Jet Li or Chow Yun Fat could pull it off.


On 07 September 2005 (11:26 AM), Dave said:

Apparently Dr. Strange has already been done, too.


On 07 September 2005 (11:38 AM), J.D. said:

For Denise (and me): Will and Abe's guide to superheroes, which mocks the ever-ridiculous Ant-Man


On 07 September 2005 (02:03 PM), Jim Osmer said:

In general movies are not capturing the feel of comics very well unless they are standard hero movies (i.e. Spiderman).
There is talk of making Watchmen into a movie. Neil Gaiman is planning on making a Death movie next year.
This reminds me of the original Dune movie which was too badly adapted to appeal to fans of the book and too confusing to those who had not read it. So no audience no success.


On 07 September 2005 (06:30 PM), John said:

I'm just glad that "V For Vendetta" is coming out.

John


On 07 September 2005 (07:56 PM), Jim Osmer said:

Unfortunately Alan Moore said the V for Vendetta script was juvenile and was not happy about it. That is another one I need to read.


On 07 September 2005 (11:24 PM), Michael Rawdon said:

You know that there was a Doctor Strange TV-movie from the 70s, right?

(I presume you already know about the execrable Captain America TV-movies.)

A Doctor Strange film could actually be quite cool, if it patterned itself after Roger Stern's character-driven run in the early 80s (which I highly recommend tracking down, by the way; great art by Marshall Rogers and Paul Smith, too).

Several of the characters you list could make good movies, but since superhero films are primarily of the "big special effects extravaganza" variety, there's little hope. I think the Fantastic Four film just about tapped out that vein, creatively.

I agree that Ant-Man isn't a character I'd pick for a film.

The comics industry, as you probably know, has been in deep doo-doo for over ten years now. The direct market - which saved the industry in the 70s - has now effectively created a comic book ghetto, limiting the growth of the periodical business. Creators are reluctant to create boffo new characters on work-for-hire contracts - having seen how previous generations have gotten the shaft when a creation hits it big - this stifling creativity. And Marvel in particular, after seemingly "getting it" with their late-90s relaunches of titles piloted by top creators, has once again decided that the brand is where the real value is, and most of their books suck again. (DC still hires good creators, but editorial policy tends to crush many of the most inventive books under the weight of silly crossovers and company "events".)

So the industry - still very much driven by the big two - is still hurting. There are many fine titles still being published, but overall things are not so good.


On 08 September 2005 (06:47 AM), Andrew Parker said:

Are y'all too anti-DC to comment on the new Superdude?


On 08 September 2005 (07:43 AM), Nikchick said:

I agree with you, JD. Marvel overestimates public interest in its characters. ANTMAN!?

Now, I am no giant comic geek, at least not in the continuity sense, but I do like comics on occasion. I'm as likely to enjoy something from Fantagraphics (Love and Rockets, anyone?) as I am to want to pick up some standard Marvel or DC, and I'd much rather read a graphic novel (e.g. Watchmen) than anything in serial.

I've watched and loved the X-Men movies, the Spidey movies were ok, the most recent Batman was adequate but nothing I'll remember fondly in a year or two. I went to see Hellboy and really liked that, and Blade was campy fun in its day (though I never read the comics) but Catwoman, Electra, Daredevil, Fantastic Four I've skipped them all. I went to see Sin City, but that isn't your typical comic or your typical movie.

Then again, with the terrible looking cheese fest Aeon Flux movie on the horizon, perhaps a movie about Antman won't be an unappealing alternative.


Post a comment
Name


Email Address
(required, not shown)


URL


Comments




Remember info?