« Reunions | Main | Foldedspace 3.0 »


23 August 2007 — The Trouble with Time Travel (13)

And now it's time for another Geek Thoughts.

Here's why I think all Earth-bound attempts at time travel are doomed to failure: Unless the time travel also involves some sort of spatial component, the time traveler is going to reappear in empty space. The Earth is in motion. The solar system is in motion. The galaxy is in motion. The universe is in motion.

By the time you finish reading this sentence, the Earth will have moved far beyond where it was located at the beginning of the sentence. If you were to travel back in time (or forward in time) just one minute, what is it that would keep you tethered to the Earth as opposed to some absolute location in the universal scheme of things, an absolute location essentially in empty space? (Or, at the very least, in the middle of an ocean.)

I'm not saying that time travel is impossible — though I believe that's likely the case — I'm just saying that time travel is impractical, and isn't likely to produce anything other than a bunch of space flotsam.

Teleportation, on the other hand, might be practical. If it's instantaneous.


Comments
On 23 August 2007 (09:00 AM), Paul J. said:

Or, you need to redefine your concept of time travel a bit.

http://www.amazon.com/Yoga-Time-Travel-Mind-Defeat/dp/083560828X

"Free your mind"...


On 23 August 2007 (05:09 PM), Dave said:

Somehow I think that if we could figure out how to move along the time-stream we could probably also figure out the spacial coordinate problem that you're referring to, thereby ensuring that we arrive not only WHEN we wanted to, but WHERE.

On the other hand, this also depends on how you define time. If time is defined as the occurrence of specific events (or even the lack of said occurrence), then such a thing might be inherently linked to a specific locale as well. In other words, referencing something in the fourth dimension of space/time cannot be done without simultaneously referencing the other three dimensions, just like you can't reference the third dimension of space without inherently referencing the other two.


On 23 August 2007 (05:41 PM), D said:

The motion part is true, but you assume going back or forward in time will maintain your spatial location.

I think that time and space are interlocked, so if you are on Earth and go back 1,000 years, you are also going back spatially 1,000 years.

When you change your spatial parameters time changes along with it. The same would be true visa-versa.


On 24 August 2007 (06:03 AM), Jon said:

Just bring your space ship along when you time travel.


On 24 August 2007 (07:23 PM), Karl Staib said:

If you travel back in time wouldn't you travel to where the planets were at that time?


On 25 August 2007 (05:17 PM), Patricia - Spiritual Journey Of A Lightworker said:

Interesting concept. We will just have to wait and see if it is plausible. Thanks for making me think.


On 26 August 2007 (12:37 PM), Mom said:

Very well thought out, J.D. I personally don't see how either time travel or teleportation are possible. But we are reaping the rewards these days of many inventions that were once deemed impossible, so I may be wrong on that, although I doubt it. ;-)

I am writing also to invite you to my blog, for a special reason, which you will see when you get there.


On 27 August 2007 (04:55 AM), B said:

Is thursday beer night?


On 27 August 2007 (07:28 AM), Wesley Crusher said:

JD's thoughts on time travel are only applicable when there is a rift in the space/time continuum.


On 30 August 2007 (05:37 AM), B said:

Ah. . . you've torn a hole in the space time continuum. Poor Gupioala is stuck typing out fishing spam forever.


On 31 August 2007 (01:56 AM), Doc Brown said:

Great Scott! Quick somebody get into the DeLorean and hide Kusoqala's keyboard before he gets home!


On 31 August 2007 (01:57 AM), Doc Brown said:

Great Scott! Quick somebody get into the DeLorean, go back in time and hide Kusoqala's keyboard before he gets home!


On 31 August 2007 (09:02 AM), mrs darling said:

ROFL!